Equitable access to care as well as improvements in cancer diagnosis and primary prevention strategies could prevent more than 2 million cancer deaths in women each year, according to a report published in The Lancet.1
Researchers studied premature cancer death in 2020 among women from 185 countries who had 36 cancer types.1,2 Of the 2.3 million women who died prematurely, an estimated 1.5 million could have avoided premature death via primary prevention or early detection strategies, and the remaining 800,000 deaths could have been prevented if women had equitable access to cancer care, according to researchers.
“[B]eing a woman impacts timely cancer care, more than being a man,” said Lancet report author Karla Unger-Saldaña, MD, of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico in Mexico City.
“[T]here are many mechanisms behind this starting with different access to education, health literacy, cancer awareness, and gender roles that interfere with women’s ability to seek care,” she added.
Women Experience Delays in Cancer Diagnosis
“[W]omen tend to be disadvantaged from first access to care for cancer, even starting from diagnosis,” said Lancet report author Verna Vanderpuye, MD, of Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana.
Studies have suggested that several cancers tend to be diagnosed later in women than in men. Women tend to have longer times from first presentation to diagnosis for gastrointestinal, genitourinary, lung, hematologic, and other cancers.3-7
For example, in a UK study of 18,618 patients, women had delayed diagnoses of lymphoma, bladder cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, head and neck cancer, and lung cancer.7
Studies have also shown that women are more likely than men to first present with cancer symptoms at emergency rooms, with the greatest disparities seen for lung and gastrointestinal cancers.8,9
These delays in diagnosis can mean that women are diagnosed with cancer at later stages than men. Research has shown that women are diagnosed with colon, rectal, and bladder cancer at later stages than men.10-14
Delays in diagnosis may be partly explained by a lack of screening. For example, researchers found that health care providers are less likely to have discussions about lung cancer screening with women than with men.15 In addition, although screening has been shown to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer, many countries have not implemented widespread screening.16,17
How Sexism Impacts Access to Cancer Care
Sexism has been shown to impact women’s access to any type of health care, and this includes cancer care.1
“Disrespectful or even discriminatory health care resulting from health care providers’ gender biases and stereotypes” affects women’s ability to receive the care they need, Dr Unger-Saldaña noted.
Studies have shown that women’s health concerns are less likely to be taken seriously and managed appropriately than men’s.18,19 Women’s symptoms are more likely to be perceived as psychosocial, women are more likely to receive non-specific diagnoses, and they are more likely to be given prescriptions for psychoactive drugs.
A cancer-specific example of overlooking women’s health concerns is how physicians have delayed the diagnosis of breast cancer by inappropriately reassuring patients that a palpable mass is benign without performing a biopsy.20
Research has also suggested that women with cancer are more likely than their male counterparts to experience adverse events related to cancer treatment, to report inadequate pain management, and to have their sexual health concerns overlooked.21-23
“[I]n the area of breast and gynecologic cancers, only very recently have people focused on sexual health and sexual side effects of cancer treatment,” said Gita Suneja, MD, of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, who was not involved in the Lancet report. “These are life-altering treatments that affect sexual health profoundly, yet we have long neglected women’s health and well-being.”
“Patriarchal ideas about women and women’s complaints often manifest in prevalent mistreatment, disrespect, negligence, and abuse of female patients by medical staff,” the authors of the Lancet report wrote. “These types of experiences can damage patients’ trust in health care providers and influence the patients’ willingness to participate in cancer screening or seek care for cancer symptoms.”
Another potential cause of suboptimal cancer care for women is the fact that they have been underrepresented in research, so cancers in women may not be as well understood as cancers in men.24,25 The causes of breast cancer, for example, are not well understood, despite the fact that breast cancer was the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide in 2020.1,26
“I think one of the key takeaways from our work was the degree to which sex and gender have not been adequately considered in cancer research, practice, and policy making,” said Lancet report author Ophira Ginsburg, MD, of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland. “We underestimated the massive role that gender-based and intersectional power dynamics play in the interactions of women with the cancer health system.”
This article originally appeared on Cancer Therapy Advisor
References:
1. Ginsburg O, Vanderpuye V, Beddoe AM, et al. Women, power, and cancer: A Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2023;402(10417):2113-2166. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01701-4
2. Frick C, Rumgay H, Vignat J, et al. Quantitative estimates of preventable and treatable deaths from 36 cancers worldwide: A population-based study. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(11):e1700-e1712. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00406-0
3. Cohn JA, Vekhter B, Lyttle C, Steinberg GD, Large MC. Sex disparities in diagnosis of bladder cancer after initial presentation with hematuria: A nationwide claims-based investigation. Cancer. 2014;120(4):555-61. doi:10.1002/cncr.28416
4. Esteva M, Leiva A, Ramos M, et al. Factors related with symptom duration until diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:87. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-13-87
5. Fonseca AL, Khan H, Mehari KR, et al. Disparities in access to oncologic care in pancreatic cancer: A systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(5):3232-3250. doi:10.1245/s10434-021-11258-6
6. Lyratzopoulos G, Abel GA, McPhail S, Neal RD, Rubin GP. Gender inequalities in the promptness of diagnosis of bladder and renal cancer after symptomatic presentation: Evidence from secondary analysis of an English primary care audit survey. BMJ Open. 2013;3(6):e002861. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002861
7. Din NU, Ukoumunne OC, Rubin G, et al. Age and gender variations in cancer diagnostic intervals in 15 cancers: Analysis of data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127717. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127717
8. Mitchell ED, Pickwell-Smith B, Macleod U. Risk factors for emergency presentation with lung and colorectal cancers: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e006965. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006965
9. Murchie P, Smith SM, Yule MS, et al. Does emergency presentation of cancer represent poor performance in primary care? Insights from a novel analysis of linked primary and secondary care data. Br J Cancer. 2017;116(9):1148-1158. doi:10.1038/bjc.2017.71.
10. Amri R, Stronks K, Bordeianou LG, Sylla P, Berger DL. Gender and ethnic disparities in colon cancer presentation and outcomes in a US universal health care setting. J Surg Oncol. 2014;109(7):645-51. doi:10.1002/jso.23567
11. Sarasqueta C, Zunzunegui MV, Enríquez Navascues JM, et al. Gender differences in stage at diagnosis and preoperative radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):759. doi:10.1186/s12885-020-07195-4
12. Danforth KN, Luong TQ, Yi DK, et al. Disparities in stage at diagnosis in an equal-access integrated delivery system: A retrospective cohort study of 7244 patients with bladder cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020;18(2):e91-e102. doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2019.09.002
13. Soave A, Dahlem R, Hansen J, et al. Gender-specific outcomes of bladder cancer patients: A stage-specific analysis in a contemporary, homogenous radical cystectomy cohort. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(3):368-77. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.003
14. Klaassen Z, DiBianco JM, Jen RP, et al. Female, Black, and unmarried patients are more likely to present with metastatic bladder urothelial carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;14(5):e489-e492. doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2016.04.006
15. Warner ET, Lathan CS. Race and sex differences in patient provider communication and awareness of lung cancer screening in the health information National Trends Survey, 2013-2017. Prev Med. 2019;124:84-90. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.05.001
16. Cervical Cancer Screening (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version. National Cancer Institute. Updated April 21, 2023. Accessed March 5, 2024.
17. Bruni L, Serrano B, Roura E, et al. Cervical cancer screening programmes and age-specific coverage estimates for 202 countries and territories worldwide: A review and synthetic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(8):e1115-e1127. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00241-8
18. Hamberg K. Gender bias in medicine. Women’s Health. 2008;4(3):237-243. doi:10.2217/17455057.4.3.237
19. Rapp KS, Volpe VV, Hale TL, Quartararo DF. State-level sexism and gender disparities in health care access and quality in the United States. J Health Soc Behav. 2022;63(1):2-18. doi:10.1177/00221465211058153
20. Goodson WH, Moore DH. Causes of physician delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(12):1343–1348. doi:10.1001/archinte.162.12.1343
21. Unger JM, Vaidya R, Albain KS, et al. Sex differences in risk of severe adverse events in patients receiving immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or chemotherapy in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(13):1474-1486. doi:10.1200/JCO.21.02377
22. Chou PL, Fang SY, Sun JL, Rau KM, Lee BO. Gender difference in cancer patients’ adherence to analgesics and related outcomes of pain management. Cancer Nurs. 2018;41(6):E11-E18. doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000532
23. Reese JB, Sorice K, Beach MC, et al. Patient-provider communication about sexual concerns in cancer: A systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11(2):175-188. doi:10.1007/s11764-016-0577-9
24. Duma N, Vera Aguilera J, Paludo J, et al. Representation of minorities and women in oncology clinical trials: Review of the past 14 years. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14(1):e1-e10. doi:10.1200/JOP.2017.025288
25. Perera ND, Bellomo TR, Schmidt WM, et al. Analysis of female participant representation in registered oncology clinical trials in the United States from 2008 to 2020. Oncologist. 2023;28(6):510-519. doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyad009
26. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
27. Ranji U, Salganicoff A, Rousseau D. Barriers to care experienced by women in the United States. JAMA. 2019;321(22):2154. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.5271
28. Doede AL, Mitchell EM, Wilson D, Panagides R, Oriá MOB. Knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes about breast cancer screening in Latin America and the Caribbean: An in-depth narrative review. JCO Glob Oncol. 2018;4(4):1-25. doi:10.1200/JGO.18.00053
29. Mwaka AD, Walter FM, Scott S, et al. Symptom appraisal, help-seeking and perceived barriers to healthcare seeking in Uganda: An exploratory study among women with potential symptoms of breast and cervical cancer. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e041365. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041365
30. Horrill TC, Linton J, Lavoie JG, et al. Access to cancer care among Indigenous peoples in Canada: A scoping review. Soc Sci Med. 2019;238:112495. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112495
31. Poteat TC, Adams MA, Malone J, et al. Delays in breast cancer care by race and sexual orientation: Results from a national survey with diverse women in the United States. Cancer. 2021;127(19):3514-3522. doi:10.1002/cncr.33629
32. Gutusa F, Roets L. Early cervical cancer screening: The influence of culture and religion. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2023;15(1):e1-e6. doi:10.4102/phcfm.v15i1.3776
33. Afsah YR, Kaneko N. Barriers to cervical cancer screening faced by immigrant Muslim women: A systematic scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:2375. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-17309-9